Ebola and the Tragedy of Political Correctness

It may be too soon to make any predictions about the course that ebola will take in the United States, but there are already a number of revelations about the current state of the government and its capture by the Progressive memeplex. A precursory analysis of the inaction being taken by the Obama regime and the defense of that inaction by Progressive propaganda outlets drill home the conclusion that there is a dangerous lack of will to take the simplest steps to protect the American people from a foreign threat. It is not that there is any inability; after all, when it came to making sure some white people wouldn’t talk about the plight of white people in Hungary, the State Department was able to act quickly and effectively to make sure such a dangerous threat to the social order would not occur. But a quarantine to protect the lives and health of American citizens which might inconvenience a few thousand Liberians and others in West Africa? Unconscionably racist.

The organs of Progressive righthink are already in overdrive to explain away the obvious incompetency of the Obama. The New York Times argues that Obama’s apparent inaction is a strategic means of preventing panic from disseminating among the sheeple:

For two turbulent weeks, White House officials have sought to balance those imperatives: insisting the dangers to the American public were being overstated in the news media, while also moving quickly to increase the president’s demonstration of action.

And when any action is ostensibly undertaken, it is to appoint a Washington veteran to coordinate the federal response. Klain’s experience with disease outbreak? Absolutely null. Yet the necessity of appointing a “political operative” is quite obvious; federal agencies are such a mess that it requires someone with a lot of clout to get these disparate groups to actually work together on a problem which demands immediate and extensive action.

In a transparent bid to protect the administration from criticism, ThinkProgress has elevated its sophistry, arguing that we shouldn’t take even basic steps to protect ourselves from ebola, since it will happen anyway. Experts are routinely corralled together to say ebola is an unstoppable force, so you may as well lie down and wait to die. Also, doing so would hurt those countries already affected, so it is our moral duty to sacrifice our own children.

This is what a government in the throes of a dangerously wrong ideology looks like. It is more important to allow the barbarians to wreak havoc, since anything else would be racist. Political correctness, which defends itself as the only way to prevent any genocidal tragedy from ever occurring, has created the perfect conditions for the development and spread of a disease with the potential to bring civilization to a grinding halt. Quite literally [skip to 12:50]. West Point, considered one of the worst slums in the world, where people literally shit on the street, is the creation of the UN. Ebola couldn’t ask for a better incubator to increase its spread.

This is without even considering the response of a post-ebola United States [assuming political and social integrity is maintained]. The communities most susceptible to high rates of infection are places with a high degree of contact with strangers and where poor hygiene is the rule rather than the exception. Cities, and especially ghettoes, in other words. Those who are prepared and can afford to get out when ebola strikes [do I need to tell you which groups of people these are?] will avoid the worst, but those people who are neither prepared nor can afford to leave afflicted areas will be disproportionately infected and killed by the disease. As we all know, disparate impact is always racist, so assuming a USG that survives ebola, we will undoubtedly hear how ebola proves the need of more extensive programs of affirmative action to help minorities. And while [predominantly white and Asian] flight takes place, these groups of people will most likely have to suffer being considered racist by New York Times writers writing from their second home in the country. No tragedy is too good to pass up for bashing the Cathedral’s enemies on the heads with, and it will make an excellent cover for the fact that the tragedy was hastened and exacerbated by incompetency forced upon us by political correctness.


3 responses to “Ebola and the Tragedy of Political Correctness”

  1. There’s all manner of currents and flows in the zeitgeist that merge with Ebola. You’ve done a good job but there is more. For instance,what are the chances if a jihadist infecting himself and making a suicide mission to the great satan?

    No one mentions that AIDS was also transmitted to humans by Africans who eat bats and monkeys. Is the eating of “bushmeat” going to accompany more African immigration? After all, we are never allowed to make members if victim groups feel bad. Why shouldn’t Afro-Americans engage in their cultural heritage and import bushmeat. Its normal to them and they apparently have a taste for it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *